HOME ABOUT US NEWS & ARTICLES LEGAL COMMUNITY CONTACT US September 6, 2010
Securities
             
 
Selecting a securities attorney for your legal case is a very important decision. Please enter a zip code to find an attorney that serves your area:
 
Zip Code:  
 

Securities Newsroom

 
 

< Back to Previous Page

Court Freezes Additional Accounts Linked to Suspicious Trades in Reebok

On August 5, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a court order freezing a securities account in the name of Sonja Anticevic ("Anticevic"), a Croatian national and resident. The Anticevic account engaged in a series of highly profitable trades in "out of the money" call options of Reebok International Ltd. ("Reebok") just prior to Reebok's August 3, 2005 announcement that it had agreed to be acquired by adidas-Salomon AG. Yesterday, the Court entered a Preliminary Injunction against Anticevic which, among other relief, continues the asset freeze.

On August 18, 2005, the Commission also filed an amended Complaint and obtained Temporary Restraining Orders and other relief against eight other defendants, including residents of the United States, Croatia and Germany trading through several domestic and off-shore accounts. Among others, the amended Complaint charged Anticevic's nephew, David Pajcin of Clifton, N.J., who is a former broker, and alleged that Pajcin placed or directed some of the Reebok trades, and tipped other defendants who placed Reebok trades.

Certain Unknown Persons trading in an account at an Austrian broker, Direktanlage.at AG ("Direktanlage").

As alleged in the amended Complaint, the defendants acted in concert or under a common direction in placing the Reebok trades, and collectively netted a profit of over $6 million.

The Commission's amended Complaint alleges the following:

On August 1 and 2, 2005, through four domestic accounts, Anticevic, Siegel, Vujovic, and Santana purchased a total of 4,097 Reebok "out of the money" call options. Collectively, these accounts comprised nearly 80% of the buy volume in Reebok call options on those days. All positions in each account were liquidated after the acquisition announcement on August 3, 2005. In total, the domestic trading netted profits exceeding $4 million.

On those same days, through foreign accounts maintained at the same broker, Anticevic, Sormaz, Lopandic and Borac purchased the equivalent of 145,240 shares of Reebok common stock. Each of those accounts sold all of its Reebok shares on August 3, 2005. On August 2, 2005, an account maintained at an Austrian broker, Direktanlage, purchased 7,545 shares of Reebok common stock, which were also sold on August 3, 2005. Collectively, the proceeds from the foreign trading in Reebok shares were more than $2 million.

In addition to the Reebok trading, overlapping trades were placed at the same time in both the domestic and foreign accounts in the securities of other companies.

Acting on the Commission's request for emergency relief, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York today issued temporary restraining orders which, among other things, freeze the proceeds of trading in Reebok securities in the domestic accounts and require the repatriation and freezing of the proceeds in the foreign accounts.

As a result of the defendants' conduct, the Commission alleges that the defendants engaged in illegal insider trading in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Among other things, the Complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, the disgorgement of all illegal profits, and the imposition of civil monetary penalties


Contact a Lawyer now for a free case review.

 

 
  Latest News  
   
  Regional Resources
 
Alabama
Missouri
Alaska Montana
Arizona Nebraska
Arkansas Nevada
California New Hampshire
Colorado New Jersey
Connecticut New Mexico
DC New York
Delaware North Carolina
Florida North Dakota
Georgia Ohio
Hawaii Oklahoma
Idaho Oregon
Illinois Pennsylvania
Indiana Rhode Island
Iowa South Carolina
Kansas South Dakota
Kentucky Tennessee
Louisiana Texas
Maine Utah
Maryland Vermont
Massachusetts Virginia
Michigan Washington
Minnesota West Virginia
Mississippi Wisconsin
  Wyoming
Browse Map >
  Hot Topics
 
  • Stock Manipulation
  • Insider Trading
  • Churning
  • Late Trading Schemes
  • Investment Fraud
  • Stock Fraud
  • Internet Fraud
  • Mutual Fund Fraud
  • Accounting fraud
  Did You Know?
 

Securities Sold in the U.S. Must Be Registered

The registration forms companies file with the Securities and Exchange Commission provide essential facts while minimizing the burden and expense of complying with the law.


 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Securities Law Offices.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Please contact a local attorney in your area for official legal and law information. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.